Legal Opinion
United States v. Weinberg
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 29, 1933No. 453PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
• Weinberg was subpoenaed to appear as a witness before the April grand jury which was investigating an alleged conspiracy by Arthur Flegenheimer and others to violate the National Prohibition Act. The witness was informed that by virtue of section 30 of title 2 of said act (27 USCA § 47) he was given an immunity from prosecution for any matter arising out of his testimony, and was then asked what his business was in 1929 and 1930, and whether the signatures on two bank account cards in the names of “Abe Berg” and “Jack Berg,” respectively, were his. Each of these…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- United States v. DowdyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1977
- United States v. OnassisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.