Legal Opinion

Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Daniel R. Grindo

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2013No. 12-0228PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a lawyer disciplinary proceeding arising from a complaint filed against Respondent Daniel R. Grindo (“Mr. Grindo”) by Petitioner Lawyer Disciplinary Board (“LDB” or “the Board”). A Hearing Panel Subcommittee (“HPS”) of the LDB determined that Mr. Grindo violated three Rules of Professional Conduct as a result of conduct stipulated to by the parties. Consequently, the HPS recommended that Mr. Grindo be admonished along with other sanctions. 1

Mr. Grindo does not contest the findings that he committed violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct and he requests this Court to accept…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. WalkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Office of Lawyer Disciplinary Counsel v. JordanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Heidi M. Georgi SturmWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. April D. ConnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Ronald S. RossiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. James J. Palmer, IIIWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Davis S. HartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API