Legal Opinion
San Bernardino National Bank v. Andreson
California Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1893No. 19,002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
APPEAL from Superior Court, San Bernardino County; John L. Campbell, Judge. Action by the San Bernardino National Bank against John Andreson and J. A. Crawford to' recover on a promissory note. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
TEMPLE, C.
Defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The complaint is in the ordinary form, upon a promissory note, which is set out, and is as follows:
*773“$2,000 San Bernardino, Cal., July 16, 1888.
“On August 16, 1888, at three o’clock P. M. of that day, (no grace), for value received, in gold coin of the government of the United States, we promise to pay to the order of San Bernardino National Bank, of San Bernardino, two thousand dollars, with interest from date at the rate of one per cent, per month until paid, payable monthly; both principal and interest…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Burnett v. StearnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Hobson v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by4 opinions
- Toon v. McCawWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Kegel v. McCormackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Henthorn v. Grand Prairie School District No. 14Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Doepke v. Christy Box Car Loader Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1913