Legal Opinion
Application of Martin N. Ornitz and Ray H. English
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 4, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7457PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 1G of appellants’ application serial No. 67,874, filed November 1, 1960, for “Alloys.” No claim has been allowed.
Appellants’ application discloses:
* * * There has long been a need for an alloy having high strength and low creep, as well as resistance to corrosion, in the temperature range 1400° F. to 2000° F., particularly for furnace parts such as annealing furnace trays, furnace rails and similar furnace parts. Conventional alloys used for these applications have not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United Chromium, Inc. v. International Silver Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Pittsburgh Iron & Steel Foundries Co. v. Seaman-Sleeth Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Application of Alvin E. NehrenbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Richard E. WoodruffCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Mehl/Biophile International Corp. v. MilgraumDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025
- JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. MYLAN LABORATORIES LIMITEDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025