Canal Insurance v. Pro Search
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.
Canal Insurance Company appeals from the trial court’s grant of Pro Search and Pro Temps’s (Pro Search) motion for summary judgment. The trial court held that Canal’s claim for amounts due under its contract to provide workers’ compensation insurance to Pro Search was barred by the statute of limitation. Because the law in Georgia is that the statute of limitation begins to run at the time contemplated by the contract, which in this case is 30 days after notice was sent of the amount due, we reverse.
“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Kicklighter v. KicklighterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Smith v. EarlyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Scarboro v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Ranwal Properties, LLC v. John H. Harland Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Hill Bros. Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Lesser v. DoughtieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- California Insurance Guarantee Association, Oklahoma Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association, and Texas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association v. Hill Brothers Transportation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015