Legal Opinion

Portland v. Gaston

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1901PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County. Action by the City of Portland against Mary Gaston to open a street. From a judgment fixing the amount of damages, defendant appeals. Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from the judgment of the circuit court rendered on an appeal from the action of the Common Council of the City of Portland in the matter of the assessment of damages suffered by the defendant in consequence of the laying out and establishment of Main Street through her premises. The charter of the city (Laws 1898, p. 146), after conferring upon the council power and authority to establish and open streets, and prescribing in detail the method of procedure, provides that the owner or owners of any lot or part thereof sought to be appropriated may, within…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. RichmondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. People Ex Rel. S. U.H.R.R. Co. v. . BettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Sullivan v. HaugMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Western American Co. v. St. Ann Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Appeal of S. O. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Macartney v. ShipherdOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. EndsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Sturgis v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. City of Portland v. NottinghamOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Blumauer-Frank Drug Co. v. Horticultural Fire ReliefOregon Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API