Young v. Bridges
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The probate court has jurisdiction to decree the distribution of Fred’s personal estate and no reasons are shown for the exercise of authority to declare its inheritance in this proceeding. Lisbon District v. Lisbon, 85 N. H. 173. The petition in respect thereto is accordingly dismissed.
The life estates of Fred as Addie’s widower and of Fred’s second wife as his widow in the real estate were not waived for interests in fee. As they have now terminated, they are to be disregarded. Also, Fred’s claim against Addie’s estate, with no effort for about thirty years to enforce it and with no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barrett v. CadySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
- Knight v. HollingsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
- Lisbon Village District v. LisbonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
- Reynolds v. HitchcockSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
3Cited by11 opinions
- Love v. RennieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Wailes v. Curators of Central CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. PalmsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Smith v. Consul General of SpainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.