Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1988No. 08-87-00082-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FULLER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a jury conviction for delivery of heroin. The court assessed punishment at twelve years' imprisonment. We affirm.

Point of Error No. One complains of two instances of improper prosecutorial jury argument outside the record. The first asserted that Appellant had a mouthful of heroin-filled balloons at the scene of the offense. The second suggested that Appellant was “strung out” on heroin. Neither comment was proper. There was no evidence to suggest either assertion, and neither can be sanctioned under the reasonable inference principle. Alejandro…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Rudd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Moraguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Landry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Traylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
  2. Bias v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  3. Elliott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. H. J. Ross v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API