Legal Opinion

Abdo v. Fitzsimmons

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 6, 2022No. 3:17-cv-00851Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOHN E. ABDO, et al., PRETRIAL ORDER 8 Plaintiffs, Case No. 17-cv-00851-TSH 9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 310, 311, 315, 331 10 MICHAEL FITZSIMMONS, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 RISING TIDE I, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-01232-TSH 14 Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. Nos. 303, 306, 309, 328 15 v. 16 MICHAEL FITZSIMMONS, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 A. Plaintiffs’ Motions in Limine 20 1. Opinion Testimony Concerning the Adequacy of Plaintiffs’ Diligence Prior to Investing 21 This motion in limine is moot because Defendants do not plan to offer opinion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lorenzo v. SEC. & Exch. Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Peterson v. WillieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Matt Strong v. Valdez Fine FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Denise v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. AquadroDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API