Legal Opinion

Carro v. Tucker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1884No. 1844PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Van Zandt County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

White. P. J.

§ 454. License; definition of; rules as to; case stated. Appellants brought this suit in the county court against appellees to recover $300, the value of a certain fence which appellees took and removed from land belonging to appellants, and for $700 damages. Appellees in their defense claimed that said fence belonged to appellee Tucker, and that he had a legal right to remove the same from the land. Verdict and judgment for appellees. It is only necessary to determine to whom the fence belonged, and to notice only the principal incidental questions germane to that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mumford v. WhitneyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Snowden v. WilasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Prince v. CaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
  4. Beatie v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  5. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  2. Emmons v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1847
  3. Scherpf v. SzadeczkyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API