Smart v. Spangler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAZLETT, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff (appellant) sued to recover $5,125 actual and $5,000 exemplary damages on account of personal injuries resulting from a blow on his mouth administered by defendant. A jury trial was had and the jury awarded plaintiff $1,625 actual and $1,000 exemplary damages.
Defendant moved for a new trial and the court made its order granting the motion, conditioned as provided in the order, as follows: “Motion for New Trial granted if plaintiff does not on or before February 19, 1924, remit all damages in excess of $500.00, exclusive of costs, upon the ground of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scott v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Ford v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Teel v. Camden Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934