Legal Opinion

Smart v. Spangler

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1928No. Docket No. 4737PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAZLETT, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff (appellant) sued to recover $5,125 actual and $5,000 exemplary damages on account of personal injuries resulting from a blow on his mouth administered by defendant. A jury trial was had and the jury awarded plaintiff $1,625 actual and $1,000 exemplary damages.

Defendant moved for a new trial and the court made its order granting the motion, conditioned as provided in the order, as follows: “Motion for New Trial granted if plaintiff does not on or before February 19, 1924, remit all damages in excess of $500.00, exclusive of costs, upon the ground of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Ford v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Teel v. Camden Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API