Legal Opinion

Bell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 28, 1968Published

1Opinion of the Court

JACK MANHEIN, Special Judge.

This case arose out of a fire which occurred in the home of Mrs. Virgie Bell in Union City. Mrs. Bell brought an action for damages for injury to her property against Sears, Roebuck & Company.' The parties will hereinafter be designated as they appeared in the trial court — Mrs. Bell as. plaintiff and Sears as defendant.

The Circuit Court heard the case without a jury, then entered a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s suit. Plaintiff prayed and perfected an appeal. We must hear the *206case de novo although., of course, the judgment of the trial court is accompanied by a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  2. Pierce v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1955
  3. United States v. James R. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. Everett v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  5. Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API