Legal Opinion

United States v. Carey

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 25, 2018No. CASE NO. 11CR671 WQHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM Q. HAYES, United States District Judge

The matter before the Court is the motion to suppress wiretap evidence (ECF No. 57) remanded to this Court on an open record by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

BACKGROUND

On October 4, 2016, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated the order denying Defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained from wiretaps and remanded "on an open record to determine what evidence was lawfully obtained in 'plain hearing.' " United States v. Carey , 836 F.3d 1092, 1094 (9th Cir. 2016). The Court of Appeals stated:

[B]ecause the order did not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. Michael LustigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Michael CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API