Legal Opinion

In Re Murray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 1936No. 26851PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This matter comes here on the petition of J. F. Murray, attorney at law, and a member of the State Bar of Oklahoma, hereinafter referred to as respondent, to review the findings and recommendations of the Board of Governors of the State Bar to the effect that the respondent be reprimanded for violation of Rule 31 of the rules of professional conduct.

The complaint arose out of the writing by respondent of certain letters to barbers of the state soliciting contributions toward the payment of his fee in connection with a case testing the validity of a law affecting barbers.

The material parts of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API