Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Birchfield

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Chief Justice.

This case arises under the uninsured motorist provision of T.C.A. § 56-1153. The issue presented is whether an insurer served with process pursuant to said code section is required to raise the defense of lack of insurance coverage in the tort action and upon failure to do so is bound by the judgment, or whether the plaintiff can only obtain judgment against the uninsured motorist in the tort action and must bring a second lawsuit against the insurer wherein the insured is permitted to litigate the issue of coverage.

We hold that the insurer must raise the defense…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glover v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Thearp v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  3. McCall v. Maryland Casualty CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Staunton v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Fisher v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Witter v. NesbitCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  4. Hutchison v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. Gatlin v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API