Hill v. City of Pineville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
CAMMACK, Chief Justice.
This appeal involves the validity of a bond issue voted by the City of Pineville. The sole question is whether or not the City is confronted with an emergency within the meaning of Section 158 of our Constitution.
*777Pineville is a city of the fourth class. Section 158 of the Constitution prohibits a city of that class from creating an indebtedness in excess of five per cent of the assessment of taxable property therein next before the last assessment previous to the incurring of the indebtedness, “unless in case of emergency, the public health or safety should so require.”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Marion v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Hurst v. City of MillersburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. City of BarbourvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
- Magoffin County v. RigsbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
- Rodgers v. Crittenden CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960