Legal Opinion

Moore v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 19, 1822PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*356Opinion of the Court.

THIS is a motion to quash a sale and sale bond under an execution of real estate, at one year’s credit, made by the purchasers under the execution and their security, on the grounds that the law under which the sale was directed and made, is unconstitutional and *357void. We have already, at the present term, in the case of Schlatter, &c. vs. Rudd, &c. decided, that a purchaser under execution cannot sustain such motion, even if it be decided that the law is unconstitutional. The decision of the court below on this point, is, therefore held erroneous.

Ante, p. 19. A sale of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sheriff of Fayette v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1822

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grayson v. LillyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1828

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API