Legal Opinion

Vincente Gatica Startti v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1969No. 27798_1PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.

Appellant seeks reversal of a district court order denying permission to file his complaint in forma pauperis. We affirm.

Appellant, a Texas convict, had filed in the court below a petition for a writ of mandamus ordering prison authorities “to cease and desist” from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Gomez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Hal Irwin v. R. H. BursonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Adepegba v. HammonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Joseph H. Norton v. E.U. Dimazana, M.D. Texas Department of Criminal JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. Adepegba v. HammonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Doyle J. Williams v. Honorable Ronald R. McKenzieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Ronald Weaver Leo McKaye Morris Martin v. Raymond Toombs Robert Brown, Jr. Donald Mason Robert Mulvaney Ted StrassburgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API