Legal Opinion

Tussing v. George A. Hormel & Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1990No. 89-1440PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

George A. Hormel & Co., the employer of Dean Tussing, a workers’ compensation claimant, and the employer’s insurance carrier, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, appeal from a district court order entered in a judicial review proceeding under Iowa Code section 17A.19 (1989). The challenged order was made in reviewing the decision of the industrial commissioner following our remand order in a previous appeal. See Tussing v. George A. Hormel & Co., 417 N.W.2d 457 (Iowa 1988).

Prior to the first appeal, the industrial commissioner had denied benefits to the claimant. The district…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Musselman v. Central Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Varied Enterprises, Inc. v. SumnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Tussing v. George A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Excel Corp. v. SmithartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Stancill v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  3. Bearce v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  4. Celotex Corp. v. AutenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API