State v. Diegle
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
1Opinion of the CourtKinkead, J.
On motion to direct verdict for defendant.
I will state at some length the conclusions of the court on the motion, which is submitted by counsel for the defendant, to take -this case from the jury.
I might just announce my conclusions, but. I always have the feeling that litigants are entitled to know the reasons for conclusions reached by the court, and especially when the matter means so much to parties; and when a court gives its reasons and if they appeal to any -one as cogent, or at least if they give evidence of careful, conscientious consideration, the parties are better satisfied when…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Brown v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- United States v. WightU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- State v. DoughertySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915