Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Vann

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 11, 2011No. 09-4298APublished

1ConcurrenceKing, Circuit Judge

Although the en banc majority utilizes the modified categorical approach to analyze whether a prior conviction for violating North Carolina General Statute section 14-202.1 (the “Indecent Liberties Statute” or “Statute”) qualifies as an ACCA “violent felony,” I am convinced that we are required by precedent to evaluate Vann’s convictions under the Statute by sole resort to the categorical approach. Either approach produces the same result in Vann’s case, but tomorrow is another day.1 I fear that our Court’s stamp of approval on future ACCA enhancements predicated on the inappropriate…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API