Legal Opinion

Emanuel v. Hernandez

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 4, 2000No. 2-99-0656PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman

Defendants and third-party plaintiffs, Jose and Lisa Hernandez, appeal an order granting plaintiffs, Wayne and Katherine Emanuel, summary judgment (735 ILCS 5/2 — 1005(c) (West 1998)) on one count of a complaint for declaratory judgment. The trial court ruled that plaintiffs have an easement by implication over defendants’ property. Defendants argue that the judgment cannot stand because plaintiffs failed to prove all the elements of either an easement by necessity or an easement by prior existing use. We agree with defendants and reverse.

Plaintiffs own the property at 920 Pearl Street in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Finn v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Granite Properties Ltd. Partnership v. MannsIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Rexroat v. ThorellIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Miller v. SchmitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gacki v. BartelsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Dudley v. NETELERAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Katsoyannis v. FindlayAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  4. DeRAEDT v. RABIOLAAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. Weaver v. CumminsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API