Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Smith

Miami County Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 19, 1960No. 38987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorter, J.

As indicated in the stipulation, the sole issue in this case is whether or not the plaintiff and the defendant, Stone Grill Company, are obligated under the lease attached to the petition, in view of the provision therein — “lessee covenants and agrees to use said premises in the operation of a tavern business and for no other purpose” and the fact that the township in which the leased premises are located was voted “dry.”

For the purpose of determining this the parties have fur-*303tber agreed that the Court can accept as true the allegations on the first page of the petition. Here among other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Imbeschied v. LernerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Doherty v. Monroe Eckstein Brewing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921
  3. Goodman v. SullivanOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Jaffe v. Patterson Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API