Legal Opinion · Dissent

Associated-Banning Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 21, 1957No. 13384Published

1DissentWashington, Circuit Judge

(dissenting) .

I am constrained to disagree with the court’s disposition of this petition. In my view, the portion of the Federal Maritime Board’s order which approved Agreement No. 8063 is final, and hence is properly reviewable now.

The Board’s order dealt with two separate but related proceedings: (1) Agreement No. 8063 filed for approval, and the protest as to it, and (2) the complaint and the motion to dismiss it. The protest attacked Agreement No. 8063, as well as containing other allegations. The complaint did not attack Agreement No. 8063 as such, but instead alleged in substance that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Howard Terminal v. United States of America and Federal Maritime BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API