Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shell v. Ohio Veterinary Medical Licensing Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2005No. 2004-0253Published

1DissentLanzinger, J.

{¶ 37} I must dissent. On the one hand, the majority finds R.C. 4741.26(A) to be clearly written but then says that there are two competing views of the statute’s meaning. Such patent ambiguity calls for interpretation.

{¶ 38} When interpreting a statute, we must read the statute as a whole rather than take single sentences out of context. R.C. 4741.26(A) provides:

{¶ 39} “The state veterinary medical licensing board shall enforce this chapter and for that purpose shall make investigations relative thereto. Except as provided in this division, in making any inspection pursuant to this chapter,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ohio Veterinary Medical Board v. SinghOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API