Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Hicks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 22, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

At the end of April 2003, claimant lost her full-time job with a gas and electric company and applied for unemployment insurance benefits. Meanwhile, claimant asked to be removed from the May schedule of her part-time employment at a supermarket—which consisted of one or two days on the weekends—for a few weeks, citing the recent loss of her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim JeffriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Antonaros (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  2. Matter of Antonaros (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  3. Matter of Oliver (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API