Legal Opinion · Dissent

Milner v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1931No. 5 Div. 796Published

1Dissent

Charge 3, refused to defendant, is as follows: "I charge you gentlemen of the jury that if you believe from the evidence that the defendant was at the still for the purpose of obtaining whisky for his sick child, and for no other purpose, and from this belief taken, and considered with all the evidence in the case, you have a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the defendant, then you should find him not guilty."

I think the refusal of the foregoing charge was prejudicial error. The charge is not abstract, nor was it in repetition of any instruction already given by the court, orally or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Prince v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API