Legal Opinion

State v. Aragon

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 2016No. Docket 34,653PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

{1} On appeal, Defendant Daniel G. Aragon attempts to have a misdemeanor driving while intoxicated (DWI) conviction in a de novo bench trial in district court dismissed because the DWI charge and a traffic citation were not joined under the compulsoryjoinderrule, Rule 5-203(A) NMRA. We hold that the compulsory joinder rule does not require joinder in this case, and therefore the district court did not err in denying Defendant’s motion to dismiss.

BACKGROUND

{2} Defendant was stopped by Officer Adrian Diaz for driving 111 miles per hour in a 55 miles-per-hour zone. During the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Office of the Public Defender Ex Rel. MuqqddinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GrubbNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. BravoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. HeyserNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. SummersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API