Legal Opinion · Dissent

Leider v. Lewis

California Court of Appeal, 2nd District

Decided January 14, 2016No. B244414Published

1Dissent

Bigelow, P.J., Dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. The majority's decision in this case will empower Leider to bring endless contempt proceedings against the Los Angeles Zoo, all based on injunctions that are contrary to California law. The trial court's findings of fact indicate that, whether in violation of Penal Code provisions or not, the living conditions of the elephants at the Zoo leave much to be desired, particularly when compared with what experts know about wild elephant habits, health, and social behaviors. Still, in my view this case ultimately turns not on any unique qualities or…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API