Legal Opinion

Sines v. Hummel

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 23, 2020No. 6:20-cv-00432Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JOHN ALBERT SINES, Plaintiff, Case. No. 6:20-cv-00432-MC v. OPINION AND ORDER JOHN HUMMEL, JASON KROPF, DARRYL NAKAHIRA, MIKE QUICK, ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, and the Office of the Oregon Attorney General and other Government agents and officers of the court, Defendants. _____________________________ MCSHANE, Judge: Pro se plaintiff John Albert Sines alleges various violations of his constitutional rights stemming from his 2006 prosecution in Deschutes County. See generally Compl., ECF No. 1. Defendant moves for summary judgment and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API