Legal Opinion

Allison v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 9, 1922No. 2125PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaetin, Judge

The primary question raised by this appeal is whether a protest must be signed in order to be valid.

*298The merchandise was lumber which was assessed with duty at the rate of 10 per cent ad valorem as cabinet wood under paragraph 169 of the tariff act of 1913.

'A protest was filed claiming free entry for the lumber as sawed boards under paragraph 647 of the act, and the collector regularly forwarded it to the board for decision.

Afterwards the protest came on to be tried by the board, and testimony was introduced respecting the character of the merchandise. The case was then submitted for decision.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Wells v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Grandmange v. SchellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
  4. United States v. ScheferU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
  5. Bodart v. SchellU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. W. X. Huber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  2. Inlander-Steindler Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Lloyd v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  4. Shigoto International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. United States v. Paramount Publix Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API