Legal Opinion

Clem v. City of Yankton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1968No. File 10511Published

1Opinion of the Court

160 N.W.2d 125 (1968)

Ronald D. CLEM, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, who may come and join in a class action, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

The CITY OF YANKTON, South Dakota, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 10511.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

July 16, 1968.

Bogue & Weeks, by Everett A. Bogue, Vermillion, for plaintiff and appellant.

Goetz, Hirsch & Haar, James T. Goetz, City Atty., and Robert W. Hirsch, Yankton, for defendant and respondent.

RENTTO, Judge.

The plaintiff a resident and taxpayer of the defendant city in this proceeding seeks a judgment declaring that Ch.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. City of Gaylord v. Gaylord City ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Green v. City of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. Boe v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Village of Deming v. Hosdreg CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API