Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Price Mercantile Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1932No. 21798PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. In a suit for malicious use of legal process, where the answer admitted an allegation of the petition that the process was sued out maliciously and without probable cause, but the answer was later amended by striking the admission and inserting in lieu thereof a denial of the allegation, the admission, though introduced as evidence for the plaintiff, was not conclusive, and could be explained or disproved by the defendant. Alabama Midland Railway Co. v. Guilford, 114 Ga. 627 (40 S. E. 794); Mims v. Jones, 135 Ga. 541, 544 (69 S. E. 824) ; McConnell v. Gregory, 146 Ga. 475 (91 S. E. 550).

*273Dec…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mims v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Alabama Midland Railway Co. v. GuilfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Sirmans v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. McConnell v. GregorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Elliott v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Aycock v. CalkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Scott v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Liberty National Life Insurance v. ParrimoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Aycock v. CalkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API