Legal Opinion

Gbur v. Golio

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 2008No. 423 WAL 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the MCARE Act foreclosed a plaintiff in a medical malpractice action against a urologist from offering expert testimony from a radiation oncologist to develop the applicable standard of care for the treatment of a cancer patient, upon the urologist’s review of a bone density study indicating “multiple foci of abnormal activity involving the right and left sides of the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. OttersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gbur v. GolioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Gbur v. GolioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API