Legal Opinion · Dissent

Verkin v. Southwest Center One, Ltd.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 21, 1989No. 01-88-00785-CVPublished

1DissentWarren, Justice

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the trial court’s judgment. The court complied with the rules as written, and the majority is simply saying that the court should have been more lenient and relaxed with its rules. In saying that the court abused its discretion by not granting the continuance, the majority is in effect substituting its judgment for that of the trial court.

In appellant’s sole point of error, he argues: 1) the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant his motion for continuance; 2) it abused its discretion in denying him leave to file an amended answer and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Villegas v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hardin v. HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Nicholson v. Memorial Hospital SystemCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Cronen v. NixCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API