Legal Opinion

Bromberg v. Fort Dearborn Casualty Underwriters

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 22, 1924No. Gen. No. 28,673PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barnes

This is an action on an insurance policy to recover damages to an automobile alleged to have resulted from a collision. The only question involved is whether the accident constituted a collision within the meaning of Item 3 of the policy, which provides as follows:

“Item 3: Against loss or damage to any part of the above automobile by collision of any object, moving or stationary, excluding damage to any tire. * * *”

The facts are not in dispute. It appears that the driver of plaintiff’s automobile in turning around on a slippery pavement backed the hind wheels over the edge of the road upon an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. London Assurance v. Companhia De Moagens Do BarreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Forest City Insurance v. HardestyIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Terwilliger v. National Masonic Accident Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ringo v. Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Walter E. Heller & Co. ex rel. Kennedy v. International Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  3. Orr v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API