Shachtman v. Masters-Lake Success, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs have attempted, by the allegations which were struck out, to plead facts which will permit them to recover, as damages resulting from a breach of the restrictive covenant, the loss of rentals from other tenants which they claim will result in the future from the alleged breach. The facts pleaded are insufficient for that purpose. In order to recover for such future loss, it will be necessary for plaintiffs to establish that the facts, which they claim will give rise to such loss, were known to both parties; and that when the lease was executed the particular loss claimed was within…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Witherbee v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Brown v. WeirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Rives v. American Railway Express Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929