Legal Opinion

In re Schatz

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 6, 2019No. Case No. 16-31208 (AMN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RE: ECF Nos. 142, 143

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART APPLICATIONS FOR COMPENSATION AND REQUIRING DISGORGEMENT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES

Ann M. Nevins, United States Bankruptcy Judge *866This Memorandum of Decision and Order addresses the financial transaction disclosure requirements mandated by 11 U.S.C. § 329(a) and Fed.R.Bankr.P. 2016(b), and the practice of using "appearance counsel" to represent bankruptcy debtors on a temporary or "drop in" basis in meetings of creditors pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 341, in hearings before the court, and otherwise throughout the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re BradleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  2. In Re JacobsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
  3. In Re TarasiakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  4. In re D'ArataUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2018

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blissful Dairy, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2025
  2. Robert A. TomsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API