Legal Opinion

Dana v. Sutton Motor Sales

California Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1961No. Sac. 7309PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for declaratory relief.

Facts: August 7, 1957, plaintiff Michael G. Dana bought a used automobile from defendants under a conditional sales contract. It was a condition of the sale (imposed by defendants) that the automobile be covered by insurance, and the subject of the insurance was accordingly discussed between plaintiff and defendants.

Plaintiff asked that he be provided with “full coverage,” and defendants undertook to provide him with it.

Defendants, however, procured a policy which merely provided collision and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clinkscales v. CarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Valdez v. Taylor Automobile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Simmons v. Civil Service Employees InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Westrick v. State Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Flowers v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API