Legal Opinion

Niblack v. Knox

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1917No. Nos. 20,974, 20,980-20,984, 20,986; No. 20,981; No. 20,980; No. 20,982; No. 20,983; No. 20,984; No. 20,974; No. 20,986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeals from Allen district court; OSCAR FOUST, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

In this and six other cases consolidated therewith certain judgment creditors of Samuel F. Knox seek to subject certain lands in Allen county to the payment of their judgments. The defendant filed an interplea setting up that his title was merely that of trustee under the will of his father, and from adverse decisions in these cases he appeals.

The father, Samuel M. Knox, died at his residence in Allen county, May 14, 1907, holding large properties in that and other places. He left a will containing ten clauses or provisions, covering in all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrow v. County Commissioners of Saline CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  2. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alumbaugh v. HedgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Dinsmoor v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Hayes v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Rathbun v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API