Legal Opinion
Doe v. Borough of Morrisville
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 17, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 89-9161PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
This matter is before us on federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343, in that claims are asserted under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985 and 1986, and under diversity jurisdiction, in that plaintiff alleges he is a citizen of the State of Michigan and that all *613defendants are citizens or public bodies of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania1.
Plaintiff John Doe is acting pro se, does not set forth an address in this District as required by Local Rule 18(b) and has not sought leave of court to file under the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rev. Timothy L. Lewis v. Attorney General of the United States and Warden, United States Penitentiary at LewisburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Doe v. United Services Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Doe v. HallockDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1987
3Cited by33 opinions
- Doe v. MeglessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Liberty Media Holdings, LLC v. Swarn Sharing Hash File AE340D0560129AFEE8D78CE07F2394C7 B5BC9C05District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- K.W. v. HoltzappleDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- B.L. v. FETHERMANDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- Boggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.