Legal Opinion

Stinson v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 20, 1957No. 6 Div. 106PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

This is the second appeal in this cause. On the first trial in circuit court, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff Stinson. On appeal, this court decided that the defendant, Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, was entitled to the affirmative charge, and the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Stinson, 264 Ala. 522, 88 So.2d 189. Under these circumstances, there being no final judgment, it was impossible to apply to the Supreme Court of the United States for a review of the decision of this court.

When the cause again came…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co v. StinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Admiral Towing Company, a Corporation and Walter B. Martinson v. Theo Woolen and Dorothy E. ConeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Admiral Towing Company, a Corporation and Walter B. Martinson v. Theo Woolen and Dorothy E. ConeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  3. Stinson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API