Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Notman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by John Eotman and others, as committee of the estate of Blanche L. Andrews, an incompetent person, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Eew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of blew York on the 10th day of March, 1905, as adjudges that the appellants are only entitled to commissions on moneys received and paid out. ,

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

The committee were appointed on the 29th day of October, 1903, and on the 11th day of bTovember, 1904, they instituted this proceeding for an intermediate settlement of their account. The committee were required to give a bond in the sum of $400,000. They received property of the incompetent of the value of $372,956. The committee asked to be allowed one-half commissions upon that part of the principal of the estate which has come into their hands and has not been converted into money. The object of the appeal is to review the denial of their application in that regard. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts McAlpineNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In re Warren E. Smith Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. In re Blossom's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Robertson v. de BrulatourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. In re the Final Accounting of Putnam County National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. In re AndrewsNew York Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API