Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Union Sawmill Co. v. Summit Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 3, 1906No. 16,299PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Action by the Union Sawmill Company for writ of mandamus to the Summit Lumber Company and others.
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
PROVOSTY, J.
The ex parte application of the relator for a mandamus was denied by one of the justices of this court, and was so denied without any assignment of reasons ; and when, within the delay for rehearing, relator sought to apply for a rehearing, his attention was called to rule 12 of this court (28 South, iv), which reads as follows:
“When a writ of review, or mandamus, or-prohibition, or certiorari, or other remedial writ, has been applied for and considered and denied by the court, the same shall be final, and no application for rehearing will be entertained.”
We will here…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Kendall v. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Dement v. RokkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- State ex rel. DeBuys v. Judges of Civil District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- State ex rel. Behan v. Judges of the Civil District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WimberlySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Unwired Telecom v. Parish of CalcasieuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- GREATER NEW ORLEANS EXPRESSWAY v. OlivierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Loeb v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- State Bond Com'n v. ALL TAXPAYERSSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.