Legal Opinion
State v. Ashley
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 7, 1989No. 10661PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation by the district court. We discuss his claim that the evidence was insufficient to support the district court’s finding that he committed extortion and deal summarily with his remaining contentions. We affirm the revocation, but not without some unease about the scope of the statutory definition of extortion, which the legislature may wish to address.
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state. See State v. Tovar, 98 N.M. 655, 651 P.2d 1299 (1982). The victim, Charles DeOurso, was looking for an investor to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. EnmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. NobleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. SchmitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- State v. TovarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. AaronNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pablo Rael v. George Sullivan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- State v. RendelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Sunwest Bank of Albuquerque, N.A. v. DaskalosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- STATE EX REL., SMITH v. RileyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Heimann v. SneadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.