Moore v. State

ZEHMER, Judge.

Defendant James Henry Moore appeals his sentence for violation of probation, raising three issues on appeal.

First, defendant contends the probationary split sentence ordered by the court is not authorized by statute and is therefore illegal. We disagree and affirm. Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989); Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988); Melvin v. State, 553 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Carter v. State, 552 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Second, defendant contends that a sentence for violation of probation in excess of the one-cell automatic bump-up is not…