Legal Opinion
Humble v. Pafford EMS
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 15, 2013No. 47,903-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
| plaintiffs, Martha Humble and James R. Humble, appeal a district court judgment sustaining peremptory exceptions of no right of action and no cause of action filed by defendant, Zach Helton. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand this matter for further proceedings.
FACTS
Plaintiff, Martha Humble, and defendants, Nicole Hackler and Zach Helton, were employed by defendant, Pafford Emergency Medical Service, Inc. (“Paf-ford”). Helton was the supervisor in charge of plaintiff and Hackler.
On July 26, 2011, plaintiff and her husband, James R. Humble, filed a tort suit naming Pafford,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bazley v. TortorichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Fink v. BryantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Industrial Companies, Inc. v. DurbinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- City of New Orleans v. Bd. of Dir. of State MuseumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCarthy v. Evolution Petroleum Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Rison v. LifeCare Hospitals of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Waye v. SalterDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020