Legal Opinion
Fishow v. Simpson
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 8, 1983No. 1348, September Term, 1982PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGetty, J.
The appellant herein, Dorothy V. Fishow, being twice aggrieved by adverse decisions in litigation initiated by her, appeals to us to reverse the second call. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, we shall affirm.
In Fishow v. Perry, Law No. 44790 in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Mrs. Fishow asserted claims of wrongful commitment and medical malpractice against Dr. Morris Perry, her physician. Gary Edward Simpson, the appellee herein, represented Mrs. Fishow in a four day jury trial that was concluded on September 29, 1977, by a verdict for the defendant, Perry. No appeal was taken…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Central Cab Co. v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Niosi v. AielloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
- Butts v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Muse v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Simko v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Berringer v. SteeleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Homa v. Friendly Mobile Manor, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Waldman v. LevineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Nemec v. DeeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.