Legal Opinion

King v. Town of Chapel Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 2013No. COA12-1262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Judge.

Factual Background and Procedural History

This case arises from the enactment of two ordinances by the Town of Chapel Hill (“Defendant” or “the Town”). The ordinances involve the regulation of towing practices and mobile phone usage. Plaintiff George King operates a towing business in the Town under the name “George’s Towing and Recovery” and filed a complaint against the Town on 2 May 2012, requesting (1) a judgment declaring the ordinances invalid and (2) preliminary and permanent injunctions barring their enforcement.

The trial court issued a temporary restraining order that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. BiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Brown v. FloweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. King v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API