Legal Opinion

M. v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 22, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01108Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 A.M., Case No.: 19-CV-1108 TWR (AGS) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS, AND (2) DISMISSING 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 15 Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 (ECF No. 12) 17 18 Presently before the Court is Defendant the United States of America’s Motion to 19 Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Mot.,” ECF No. 12), as well as Plaintiff 20 A.M.’s Partial Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 16) and Defendant’s Reply in Support of 21…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API